Brother John Formsma recently posted the following article on Twitter. He has given me permission to do minor editing and reprint it here. The views John presents fit well into inmillennialism. In addition, they agree with some scholars of the highest order. For example, see John Lightfoot on the “New Heavens…
John Formsma
John Formsma
John Formsma is a professional piano tuner/technician, and in his spare time produces audiobooks of primarily Reformed Christian books. He and his wife Miriam have three sons in college. They live in New Albany, MS, and attend Christ Church New Albany. John enjoys reading, bicycling, and healthy living.
-
-
Book of 2 PeterGuest BloggersProphecy
The New Heavens and Earth — Part 4
by John Formsmaby John FormsmaIn three previous posts (here, here, and here), I showed that Peter did not predict the end of the physical creation in 2 Peter 3:10–13. My Supplement to these posts provides clues that he was describing God’s final judgment upon the Jewish nation. Peter’s prophecies included things after the judgment,…
-
Book of 2 PeterGuest BloggersProphecy
The New Heavens and Earth — Part 3
by John Formsmaby John FormsmaIn my last post (here), I listed four points that show Peter was not speaking of the literal heavens passing away in 2 Peter 3:10–13. I discussed the first point and will now look at the other three. 2. Peter specifically linked the judgment of the scoffers, the day of…
-
Book of 2 PeterGuest BloggersProphecy
The New Heavens and Earth — Part 2
by John Formsmaby John FormsmaThe points I made in my last post (here) are enough to establish the legitimacy of interpreting particular biblical language in a non-literal way. However, I need to prove it is legitimate to do so regarding the new heavens and earth of 2 Peter by making the following points: Peter had…
-
Book of 2 PeterGuest BloggersProphecy
The New Heavens and Earth — Part 1
by John Formsmaby John FormsmaMuch confusion exists regarding the Day of the Lord and the New Heavens and Earth of 2 Peter 3. The Apostle Peter did not write confusing statements, but we have obscured his meaning. If Peter heard your views about this passage, would he agree with them? Or would he scoff?…